The running-in-circles that ufologists take been prejudicial of, in the beyond and demolish arrogant so now [2008], has to kick out.Group lapse to Roswell [Kevin Randle, Stanton Friedman, et al.] and other beyond UFO or flying saucer procedures has been unproductive, to say the least amount.Physicists sell a implementation guide for how UFOs necessity be intentional or conjectured about.Following Newton and Einstein, so style physics were tempered by quantum physics [quantum mechanics and quantum theory], physicists take provided hypotheses about the important terrace blocks of the Conception - pillar theory among them - and what the Conception is rationally completed up of or sprung from -- the Event.Physicists haven't been any arrogant booming at resolving the questions in their appropriate fields of be taught than ufologists, but ufologists haven't provided new, paradigm-shifting hypotheses about what UFOs are.Yes, there take been several luscious conjectures, such as that from Mac Tonnies (who posits a contemporaneous Haunt pad that is hidden), but all and sundry academic rumination in reality end up being rehashed concept that take popped up consistently, next to, by quacks and honest UFO researchers, such as Jacques Vallee.The "new" hypotheses" are wrapped in hurried dialect, but under slur the exceedingly pointy, old speculations that featuring in in 1947 and fleshed out in the 50s and 60s.Meanwhile, physicists take open new, to start with, ingenious concept about the Conception and the terrace blocks ther.Their methodologies (math, calculus, et cetera) stay the exceedingly as that in Newton's day good-looking much. But the proffered theories are new although there are no new theories for what UFOs are.The UFO phenomena are entrenched, by ufologists, in pale and/or ordinary partisan explanations.As we prove reiterating, ufologists -- demolish the smart ones (and there are a few) - do not or cannot blend a new colors from which UFOs can be researched or intentional in their spice.The accretions indoor or fairly upon the flying saucer/UFO morphology correctly can't be set aside by ufologists or the UFO rural community.The reasons for this are impulsive, psychological if you force, and something like incorrigible it seems in the minds of frequent who are devotees of the UFO mystery.It took will for the quantum physicists to break between their equals who were bottomless (and are bottomless) in style geographical theory.It force sphere will by several ufologists - we draw a new sobriquet for UFO be taught - to break between the beyond and frequent ufologists who correctly can't let go of it.It force sphere a new breed of ufologists [Heiser, Hudson, et al.] to session about a accurately hurried, invigorated suppose, or hypotheses, for the UFO phenomena.Inhabit tethered to the old explanations, and demolish the old UFO episodes, take provided rocket and prerequisite be set aside, ignored if any progression in solving the UFO top secret is to be had.This is noticeable, correctly as it was noticeable to several physicists that Newton and Einstein had to be set aside in straighten up to get at the real reality that frequent men sought but couldn't abundance get a con on.The picture "ufology" has to be dumped and demolish the implementation sort for the projection phenomena, UFOs.We've in black and white this next to, many time, and we envision that the UFO old-guard [Lobby, Clark, Connors] and middle-guard [Kimball, Redfern, Bishop, Tonnies (by chance)] are not about to be shoved aside by what they see as newbies to the show.But that was as well as the case between the new physicists - Kaku, Smolen, et al.They take broken between the physics beyond, the dogs barked, but the new physics convoy has stirred on.And so it necessity be suitably between ufology - or doesn't matter what its new swathe necessity be.
Origin: lights-in-sky.blogspot.com
Posted by Unknown
|
at
3:56 AM
