Mj 12 Is Really Project Aquarius

Mj 12 Is Really Project Aquarius
Kevin Randle, a top UFO pollster and smoothly a fortunate adjudicator of several UFO conspiracies, gives a territory on the prospective theory of the MJ-12 documents and that they appeared in 1981, not in Jaime Shandera's mailbox in 1984: I admit been reviewing the history of MJ-12 and I admit found no matter which uncontrollable. The first entrust of MJ-12 was not in the function of Tab and Jaime Shandera conventional the adolescent film. It wasn't horizontal in the function of Moore was agreement a unmarked sooner than Bob Pratt, former editor of the "MUFON Journal "and beyond relator for the "National Enquirer."No, the first entrust of MJ-12 was in 1981 in a one tone document that seemed to be a convincing AFOSI teletype observe that has cook noteworthy as the Aquarius Telex or the Aquarius Track record. It is, in fact, a retyped text of an AFOSI report on UFOs photographed and filmed by Paul Bennewitz over Albuquerque, New Mexico. Although the lion's share of this document seems to be from a real report, impart is one line that is not in the main. It says, "Have a spat of Set of circumstances Aquarius is nonetheless classified Top Hidden sooner than no dispersion rise say Deduce channels and sooner than inflexible accomplish to "MJ - TWELVE". [Significance treat.]"Featuring in was a entrust of MJ-12 that seemed to admit gone overlooked. A few UFO researchers attempted to understand about Set of circumstances Aquarius sooner than little unplanned but none seemed inquisitive, at that time, in MJ-12. Eventually every, such as Lee Graham and Barry Greenwood, by the use of FOIA, attempted to progress additional information. Graham well-versed more in the function of Tab Moore showed him a passage of the Eisenhower Update Track record. Graham was able to transport a list of the names of inhabit connected sooner than MJ-12 to Greenwood.The director is, nevertheless, that MJ-12 was mentioned want otherwise the adolescent film clothed in in 1984. Moore, in fact, contacted Bob Pratt and told him about MJ-12 in 1982 sooner than the dream up of writing a book. Pratt felt that Moore didn't admit lots evidence to ability a nonfiction book, but deliberation they could present it in a unmarked. Pratt's in commission title? "MAJIK - 12."I admit, over the last numerous months attempted to get the high-status proponents of MJ-12 to present this. Robert Thicket has responded that he was going to do no matter which about it, let me be aware of what he deliberation about it, but that resolution has not clothed in. Stan Friedman wrote, in resolution to my first distrust that he was about to tolerate a plane but would admit no matter which taking into account. He has yet to transport that, let in competition respond to my last email.MJ-12 didn't barely sphere in the function of the film clothed in at Shandera's house. It had been mentioned otherwise, and a unmarked had been written about it. Pratt deliberation, in the function of the MJ-12 stories hit the press in 1987, they obligation account to endorse the unmarked once once again. He wrote to Moore portentous that, but never got a resolution.You admit to startle about the reality of no matter which that appeared for the first time in a document that was taking into account to be declared a hoax (or moderately the text that MJ-12 was a retyped text that treat the line about Set of circumstances Aquarius and MJ-12). Here's the thing that hasn't been discussed. Let us say that impart is a admirably classified project noteworthy as MJ-12... So secret that practically zero about it has been found. Now dependence that you stress to dowry disinformation inwards the UFO metropolitan to fail to appreciate it, and you admit a trade of discrediting Paul Bennewitz to the same degree his research could chance a real, non UFO accidental but classified project. You fad a sham document and rein that it cascade inwards his hands, in suspense he would run to the media sooner than it. When he had achieve that, in addition to you thrash out the real document to reveal he has an discrete one... and you wretched that he is legally responsible for the change and you make clear that he is changeable.So far, so fortunate. But the very last thing you are going to do is put in that disinformation the uprightness of a real, admirably classified project that is so secret that no one rise a trifling manager circle knows about. To do so would be chance that project to review by UFO researchers who are legally responsible for thousands upon thousands of FOIA needs. You've now of a nature them information that they shouldn't admit. Stage is no box to chance MJ-12, if it exists, in a document invented to contaminate Bennewitz.Spell Randle explains that while Set of circumstances Aquarius existed, that doesn't vitally mean that MJ-12 did. But I admit always been enthralled by the prospective existence of written proof of the Roswell End and realize of ETIs and I honey the moving parts of Stanton Friedman, horizontal whereas I don't acquiesce sooner than every of his theories of UFOs.Esteem to Kevin Randle anyway and I bank on he expands on this in the later.MJ-12: Beating THE Deceased Steeplechaser

Posted by Unknown | at 7:37 PM