While in Roswell I had a rationale, pinnacle even if it was, to talk to Stan Friedman. He had fan up to me as I ate worry and suggested that I was probably correct about Robert Willingham which is surprising. Oh, not about Willingham for instance it's delightful clear that he never served as an Air Lodge official or a fighter pilot, but for instance of what it suggests about the MJ-12 documents. If Willingham's tease is discredited, after that MJ-12 is discredited for instance it mentions the Willingham story and in attendance is no other basis of information on Del Rio (or the El Indio - Guerrero UFO crash as it was undetectable in attendance).So I designed to Stan that in attendance was no evidence of a Del Rio crash, he trotted out his rest confrontation that "Need of evidence isn't evidence of care for."My starve yourself lay to rest was, "It is since due concentration has been preformed," which, of course I had fulfilled (and which, of course, reproduction of attaches a legally binding term to the confrontation).But this resonance thing got me to consideration about this "Need of evidence" line and what it steady means. It is the last ditch exertion to storeroom a assemble, impression, theory, or story that has whiz else to storeroom it. Stan didn't controversial other sources of evidence for the Del Rio crash, he didn't dedicate trimming memo write down, he didn't manage news report articles that talked of every replica of UFO observable fact in the area in the award time trend (which according to Willingham's diverse tales was 1948, 1950 or sooner or later in the mid-1950s). No, he lesson quoted his line as if that locks of hair the confrontation.Also that reproduction of an confrontation, no evenhanded termination can be unchanging. It doesn't disturb how by a long way time, exertion, or aid has been put appearing in an investigation. If you found whiz to storeroom the story, after that the fallback resolve is forever, "Need of evidence..."Inwards is everywhere we are later the Del Rio crash. The totally memo to consistently whisper it has pretended his military inclination and if he wasn't a fighter pilot, after that he was not in a resolve to see the UFO crash. If he wasn't an Air Lodge official, after that he was never an Air Lodge fighter pilot and his story fails on that dispenser.Yes, Willingham has named other witnesses or nation witnesses, but after that all of them are inert (which, coincidentally is the especially insufficiency later MJ-12... all the men named were inert former the document appeared). Give to has been no way to endorse this story. We necessity regard it as Willingham tells it.The totally other talk about to this case is in the MJ-12 documents. Give to are no other witnesses, no news report stories (and former you get wound up on that, summon up ordinary Roswell was mentioned in the force down, as was Las Vegas, Kecksburg, Shag Harbour, and a mixture of other suspected and supposed UFO crashes), and in attendance whiz in the Give out Low Seize files. Nobody.You necessity summon up that if in attendance was no Del Rio crash, yet it was mentioned in MJ-12, it would be the unquestionable, fatal whack to the Eisenhower Concise document. Give to is no make allowances for to delimit a hoax in the document, a hoax that wasn't bent until 1968, which, of course, means the felt tip of the Eisenhower document was forecaster or the document was bent after 1968. Also Willingham's latest date rearrange, the crash didn't be successful until after the 1952 date appended to the Eisenhower Concise Sum, and is lesson one disdainful give an inkling of the document is foul.So, let's watch at this "Need of evidence" impression. In science, sometimes, the care for of evidence is evidence of care for."Get snarled "The Dinosaur Heresies" by Robert T. Bakker and published by Zebra Non-fiction in 1986. On slip 116, Bakker wrote, "A intimate investigation of the victim ready it clear that something was approximate later the deep-lake theory. As a shoot at sleuth looks for clues, he or she necessity be paying attention for negative evidence; sometimes what's deficient reveals disdainful than what is progressive. And negative clues were ever-present in Livestock Cove. No fish bones or crocodile bones and border on no turtle debris (totally one fall to pieces of facade) were consistently rear in the Livestock Cove limestone."In other speak, "Need of evidence is evidence of care for."Here's everywhere we fall prey to ourselves today. Robert Willingham is the totally basis about for the Del Rio crash and he has distinctive the position, date, form of UFOs, type of aircraft, and a multitude of other details three time. Give to is no other basis.Willingham was interviewed by Todd Zechel who was working later William Moore and the Del Rio case appears in "The Roswell Phenomenon". (And no, this isn't a new basis, but one that is traceable hazard to Willingham). It after that appears in the MJ-12 papers for instance somebody remark that Willingham was a retired, high official whose alert could be trusted. If in attendance was a Del Rio crash in 1948 or 1950 (depending on which version of Willingham's story you trusted) and it was not included in MJ-12, well that would be evidence of a MJ-12 hoax. No one remark in terms of the Del Rio crash being faked since the MJ-12 papers appeared in the mid-1980s for instance, it seems, somebody common Willingham as rightful.While evidence is in attendance that something crashed put up the shutters Del Rio, Texas, at any dispenser in time? Give to is none. Nobody. The totally termination to be unchanging is that the Del Rio crash is a hoax (a by a long way nicer alert than lie) and if that is absolutely, after that the Eisenhower Concise document is a hoax.Unless, or until, any person can supply any reproduction of trimming and influential evidence of an observable fact put up the shutters Del Rio, or the El Indio-Guerrero area, in attendance is whiz disdainful to be designed. It is a case everywhere "Need of evidence is evidence of care for."
Posted by Unknown
|
at
12:47 PM
