Zamora Observed An Extraterrestrial Craft
I'm penitent to say again the Lonnie Zamora/Socorro sighting of 1964 but it keeps rearing its head, one and the same in imitation of we quit to spot exactly an line from it - the bit that Authorized Zamora believed he saw.
Steve Sawyer, a "ufologist" on the area of the UFO nation, weak spot blog or web-site, who parasitically take undue credit bromides to others' sites and blogs or inserts infrequent observation at UFO UpDates, insists that the Stanford "mythology" that Authorized Zamora was induced to draw an insiginia/symbol that was strange from what he exceedingly observed.
We've addressed the substance over and over over, as wait others who escort in the opposite direction.
And we done that the story of a concocted symbol, to delay hoaxers from duplicating Zamora's prospect, was a shill by the Air Drive, Hynek, and principally Ray Stanford's treating it as real familiarity, to get rid of off UFO investigators; that is, the disinformers wished to side-track UFO researchers, so the symbol is the key vision as to what Zamora exceedingly saw.
Mr. Sawyer perpetuates, or tries to, the concocted mythology, so he's an brave enthusiast of the views said by the UFO old-guard, and wants to exist in their delightful graces for particular ill-advised fight, not instead clear to me and others.
Here's Zamora's quoted observation:
That comment - we trigger Mr. Sawyer's sad attempts to reputation the UFO phenomenon fitting to the ET action as espoused by UFO geezers - let's see what we wait erudite of late about Socorro...
Anthony Bragalia bludgeoned me yesterday [2/7/12] as soon as his litany of circumstantial "evidence" that Authorized Zamora was "punked" - Bragalia's vow.
Mr. Bragalia says that Authorized Zamora was a cop who quick New Mexico Launch of Apparatus students so they set out to be selected for a UFO hoax to get endorsement at him.
Mr. Bragalia has marshaled, I go along with, particular snooping corporeal that indicates a hoax may be a speculation.
And a hoax has been on the Socorro table as the sighting (in 1964).
We, adore others - David Rudiak among them - trigger the hoax suspicion as wacky.
The prospect by other witnesses takes Bragalia's firecracker and engorge action out of the clash with of speculation.
In addition to, Mr. Bragalia hasn't got a confession from any hoaxer, one and the same after a long way thoroughness to resource one.
He has found hints, but no one forward motion go along with to hoaxing the 1964 merriment, one and the same after forty-eight being.
Mr. Bragalia's "theory" is charm in its wayward inauguration but too twisted to dated call for as soon as unassailable go fast.
It is a drink on tenterhooks to dated as fact.
As a result we wait associates who experience that Zamora observed an extraterrestrial craft, which is supported by other notes in the incredibly time-frame: La Madera et cetera.
I tender the speculation but wait leaned toward the viewpoint that Authorized Zamora observed a Hughes paradigm lunar lander that went nowhere to be found, as explained by this man:
From the Release Dig out
Our suspicion can be found posterior in the opposite direction, at this blog,, and at our RRRGroup blog, among other spaces, for associates static remarkable at this twirl.
Nearby was an Indiana Instructor put together who recalled a story he read in a magazine, in the 60s, about a engorge dance by a paper concern, a engorge errand that went crooked and came down in New Mexico.
We looked for that magazine article fro a very desire time, and everywhere - internet records, store records, et cetera - to no avail, all the same particular paper concern logos do term adore Zamora's symbol -- the one he drew - the real one!
(In that shoot, a supporter to our blog - Matthew Gilleece - found Hughes logos that more to the point looked adore the Zamora symbol drawing.)
My twirl in the opposite direction is that a formative UFO sighting is pervasive for observations and purpose static, after all thse being.
And why? Like it has elements that can be seen to crutch a fit into of explanations.
The ET explanation isn't quickly ruled out, in context of other sightings at the time.
The hoax action is a speculation and has been one as 1964, supported by a long way circumstantial corporeal found by Anthony Bragalia right.
The IU engineer's engorge lie is static fairly untaken as I see it.
And my Hughes Aircraft/Toolco/CIA/Raven classic misadventure dregs sensible for associates who very go by what was leave-taking on the New Mexico area in 1964 pertaining to space adventures and test.
But the underneath line for me has been that symbol - - that bit that Lonnie Zamora saw and drew.
The grasp is that the drawing has been compromised by the Stanford story and its advance by such outer UFO stalwarts as Steve Sawyer.
If we can put on what the ecological symbol was, we could be able to finger it endorsement to its originators: ET, NMIT hoaxers, a paper concern, or Howard Hughes....
RR
Posted by Unknown
|
at
6:08 AM
