20. August 2009, 7: 41 am ALIEN ABDUCTION, crop circles, alien, Flying Saucers, history, message board, outer space, Paranormal, science, space, alien, UFO, UFOs, UFO videos, images, UFO 4 Comments 4 Comments In all honesty, I must say not only was close but also surprised. This segment started in exactly the same way, as was suspected. The first mistake was when the Narrator Ju Ju Chang stated that the people interviewed all of the "Ufos". If you want to set your teeth on the right side. Now not only was I convinced more half-assed reporting and segment trends, shop was. Say, someone believes in Ufos is absurd. UFO can believe, such as the UFO is the only UFO. It is one of the flying cannot be explained by the importance of a scientific term. More appropriate would be persons interviewed "believe you've been in the framework of the extraterrestrials '. See, it's best to say that some Ufos are extraterrestrial origin theory. There are many theories about some Ufos might be. The following segment is transferred to the robust approach the rental, kidnapped are related to the experiences. Chang some safe but important questions, but they were so light, let them more than answers to questions. It is served in the topic of the meeting of the ABC, and more if the abduction was targeted and hard, scientific methods, and should be used by the Government to confirm that you are the phenomena. All equipped with a tracking device, such as the use of house arrest are examples of innovation, journalism? If not, why not? How long does the phenomenon continue? How widespread is it? This segment only surfed the safe problem and the only director/producer was used to quickly fire movies and inexplicable photos. In other words, it was within an inch of his life until the gums UFO instead of a piece of one of our informative look for entertainment in the age of the main phenomena. Of course, it was the segue "psychiatric professionals to assess and was the main findings of the psychiatrist to examine the issue instead of the talks, they look over speculation and vague findings. The level of sloppiness was as high as I had waited even close. It was more the approach, saying: the problem is important enough to justify a short but the teeth in these sharks was sunk. Dr. Susan Clancy and his assessment of the phenomena is again for the moment, the basic types of abductions and that those of us who have examined the circumstances, he sounds like a wide range of nursery school colleague vali. He may mean well, but he has the heck to make a lot of homework. He notes that the people he is examined or interviewed are not crazy, and that is what many experts have pointed out in the past 10 years. This is in contrast to what you want to use on people who have claimed to have abducted the witness only, but are also sent to the psychiatric hospital in the old days and it must be said, or worse, but will not be able to think, worse than being sent to the psychiatric hospital, other than those to be sent to the one in Siberia. News segment will open up the dialogue? Hopefully the but only if the dialogue to real science and real in the direction of the application of solid work moved, detective. We need science and Detective work, as well as at the bottom of the problem, decrease its charlatans. Ride is not more than still seriously.
Credit: chupacabra-digest.blogspot.com
Posted by Unknown
|
at
8:04 PM
